{"id":3307,"date":"2006-10-30T14:05:00","date_gmt":"2006-10-30T14:05:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/index.php\/2006\/10\/30\/quelquun-a-signe-pour-ca\/"},"modified":"2006-10-30T14:05:00","modified_gmt":"2006-10-30T14:05:00","slug":"quelquun-a-signe-pour-ca","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/?p=3307","title":{"rendered":"quelqu’un a sign\u00e9 pour \u00e7a ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

qui n’a pas d\u00e9j\u00e0 r\u00e9alis\u00e9 que trop de monde autour d’une table \u00e0 prendre des d\u00e9cisions, \u00e7a finit par un concept plut\u00f4t mi\u00e8vre. question de faire plaisir \u00e0 tout le monde. est-ce par paresse ? est-ce par gentillesse ? est-ce une bonne pratique ? je ne crois pas. <\/p>\n

un mauvais design co\u00fbte aussi cher \u00e0 produire qu’un bon.
alors aussi bien que \u00e7a soit bon, efficace et communicatif.<\/p>\n

quand c’est mauvais, vraiment mauvais, je me dis qu’il y a bien quelqu’un quelque part qui a sign\u00e9 et pay\u00e9 pour ce \u00abn’importe quoi\u00bb. quelqu’un a d\u00fb faire du temps suppl\u00e9mentaire pour cette horreur. mis\u00e8re.<\/p>\n

dans la m\u00eame veine, trouv\u00e9 sur le blog de design observer ce propos de william drenttel<\/a> au sujet du nouveau logo pour le 50e anniversaire de l’union europ\u00e9enne. r\u00e9sultat d’un concours. un logo pour faire plaisir \u00e0 tout le monde. un logo qui utilise une id\u00e9e facile et vue je ne sais plus combien de fois. drenttell fait une belle d\u00e9monstration de cette id\u00e9e dans son commentaire.
est-ce que ce paquet de lettres disparates est symbole d’union ?<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00ab… ‘ve taken part in a few such meetings myself, especially during a ten-year stint working in advertising. Often a bad idea is made worse in such gatherings, as people attempt to improve on a concept by adding their own needs and biases, layer-upon-layer, until everyone is happy. But such committee solutions cannot overcome the fact that if the original idea is weak, the result is merely a weak idea with everyone’s name on it.<\/p>\n

Occasionally, the same thing happens in design meetings, especially with logos that, for whatever reason, must represent multiple nationalities, disciplines or facets of an organization. How can one single piece of graphic design be expected to accomodate all of these needs?\u00bb William Drenttel<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

qui n’a pas d\u00e9j\u00e0 r\u00e9alis\u00e9 que trop de monde autour d’une table \u00e0 prendre des d\u00e9cisions, \u00e7a finit par un concept plut\u00f4t mi\u00e8vre. question de faire plaisir \u00e0 tout le monde. est-ce par paresse ? est-ce par gentillesse ? est-ce une bonne pratique ? je ne crois pas. un mauvais design co\u00fbte aussi cher \u00e0 produire qu’un bon. alors aussi bien que \u00e7a soit bon, efficace et communicatif. quand c’est mauvais, vraiment mauvais, je me dis qu’il y a bien quelqu’un quelque part qui a sign\u00e9 et pay\u00e9 pour ce \u00abn’importe quoi\u00bb. quelqu’un a d\u00fb faire du temps suppl\u00e9mentaire pour cette horreur. mis\u00e8re. dans la m\u00eame veine, trouv\u00e9 sur le blog de design observer ce propos de william drenttel au sujet du nouveau logo pour le 50e anniversaire de l’union europ\u00e9enne. r\u00e9sultat d’un concours. un logo pour faire plaisir \u00e0 tout le monde. un logo qui utilise une id\u00e9e facile et vue je ne sais plus combien de fois. drenttell fait une belle d\u00e9monstration de cette id\u00e9e dans son commentaire.est-ce que ce paquet de lettres disparates est symbole d’union ? \u00ab… ‘ve taken part in a few such meetings myself, especially during a ten-year stint working in advertising. Often a bad idea is made worse in such gatherings, as people attempt to improve on a concept by adding their own needs and biases, layer-upon-layer, until everyone is happy. But such committee solutions cannot overcome the fact that if the original idea is weak, the result is merely a weak idea with everyone’s name on it. Occasionally, the same thing happens in design meetings, especially with logos that, for whatever reason, must represent multiple nationalities, disciplines or facets of an organization. How can one single piece of graphic design be expected to accomodate all of these needs?\u00bb William Drenttel<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3307","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-graphisme-typographie","category-point-de-vue"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3307","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3307"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3307\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3307"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3307"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gycouture.com\/blogue\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3307"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}